![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_OoFgZDOaX65rndoX4Rh4lexRDyBX722WpomKG4GRnli3pEEkZCbOjwdqS7oxaOEs1eqITokfLAgf_cZc2668VgsaAebSx5wEGqU5cUfv2YMa7CqqOIu3Dls54LSe7-fwtk3d3bf9EhxY/s610/uk-lgflag.gif)
The court unanimously rejected the argument that the trial had been unfair, noting that although counsel for the company "was at pains to distance himself from any suggestion that a corporate conspirator could never be tried in the absence of a [directing mind and will], it is plain that, if well-founded, his principal submission would have wide and untoward ramifications .... it can only be in a very rare case that the absence of a [directing mind and will] would itself be determinative of the question whether a corporate defendant could receive a fair trial. " (paras. [53] and [58]).
No comments:
Post a Comment