At issue in the current case was whether assistance could be given where, in Jersey, there were no existing or planned insolvency proceedings. The trial judge, Mann J., held that it could not and stated (at para. [18]):
Without some form of existing or future intended activity by the foreign insolvency court, I do not see how that court is "assisted". Creditors might be; a foreign commercial community might be helped by an English court doing what its own courts cannot do. But that is not enough. It is the foreign insolvency court, in its insolvency jurisdiction, which has to be assisted. The section does not exist to fill in gaps in another jurisdiction's insolvency processes without more. It exists to improve co-operation between actual processes. In the present case, for the reasons given, the Jersey court is not assisted in a relevant way."Update (24 April 2013) - the ICLR has provided a summary of the decision: see here.
No comments:
Post a Comment