data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64cbb/64cbb4b50a5eb21b050f14a3aabffc29cdf41cbe" alt=""
Earlier this week the
High Court of Justice gave judgment in
Malone v Mitchell (CHP 13/0140). This decision is noteworthy because it appears to be the first Manx decision to consider the appointment and role of a so-called conflict liquidator. The judge -
His Honour The Deemster Doyle, First Deemster and Clerk of the Rolls - applied the approach adopted in the
English High Court by
Mr Justice Newey in
Re York Gas Ltd [2010] EWHC 2275 (Ch) and held that in the case before him there where reasons for declining to appoint a conflict liquidator from within the same firm as the liquidator. Deemster Doyle observed (at para. 80): "I accept on the basis of
Re York Gas that the appointment of an additional office-holder as conflict liquidator from the same firm or company as the liquidator can, in principle, sometimes provide a cost effective and efficient solution to a conflict in respect of the determination of a proof of debt". A summary of the judgment is available
here (
pdf).
No comments:
Post a Comment