![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_OoFgZDOaX65rndoX4Rh4lexRDyBX722WpomKG4GRnli3pEEkZCbOjwdqS7oxaOEs1eqITokfLAgf_cZc2668VgsaAebSx5wEGqU5cUfv2YMa7CqqOIu3Dls54LSe7-fwtk3d3bf9EhxY/s610/uk-lgflag.gif)
Judgment was delivered today in Duneau v Klimt Invest SA & Ors [2022] EWHC 596 (Ch). While first instance, I note it here (rather quickly) because of the very interesting discussion it contains concerning the extent to which 'equitable considerations' can arise - for the purposes of just and equitable winding-up (section 122(1)(g) of the Insolvency Act 1986) and the unfair prejudice remedy (sections 994-996 of the Companies Act 2006) - in public companies.
No comments:
Post a Comment