The company's dissolution had been deferred until 13 May 2025 (dissolution would ordinarily have occurred on 2 February 2021). Judge Barber held that the deferral no longer served a useful purpose: the original purpose - to investigate the company's affairs - had concluded and had needed only several months. It was also held - in the absence of express, statutory guidance - that Mr Kumar (the company's sole director and sole shareholder) had standing to bring the appeal under section 205.
No comments:
Post a Comment