.... [it is argued that] a
failure simply to explain the basis upon which monies are received
cannot properly form the subject matter of a winding up petition
presented on public interest grounds. There is force in this point, and in
the main I consider that this must be right, but I do not consider that
one can exclude there being circumstances in which a failure to explain
might, in itself in the particular circumstances of the case, be
indicative of the relevant company operating in an illegal or otherwise
inherently objectionable way, or should be taken to be so indicative,
such that the Court is entitled to proceed on the basis that the affairs
of the Company have been, or are being, conducted in an inherently
objectionable way so as to disclose a lack of probity."
Update (19 May 2021) - the
ICLR has published a summary of the decision: see
here.
No comments:
Post a Comment