The Court of Appeal gave judgment earlier this month in SCK Serijadi Sdn Bhd v Artison Interior Pte Ltd [2019] SGCA 5. A copy of the judgment is available here (pdf) and a summary is available here. The decision is an important one in which the court explained why the service of a garnishee order nisi did not render the judgment
creditor a 'secured creditor' for the purposes of sections 299(2) and 334(1)
of the Companies Act, 2006 Rev Ed, Cap 50.
Monday, 21 January 2019
Singapore: service of garnishee order nisi did not make creditor secured
The Court of Appeal gave judgment earlier this month in SCK Serijadi Sdn Bhd v Artison Interior Pte Ltd [2019] SGCA 5. A copy of the judgment is available here (pdf) and a summary is available here. The decision is an important one in which the court explained why the service of a garnishee order nisi did not render the judgment
creditor a 'secured creditor' for the purposes of sections 299(2) and 334(1)
of the Companies Act, 2006 Rev Ed, Cap 50.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment