The Supreme Court gave judgment earlier today in BNY Mellon Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v LBG Capital No 1 Plc [2016] UKSC 29. A summary of the judgment is available here (pdf). By a majority of 3:2, the court held that Lloyds Banking Group was entitled to redeem £3.3 billion of enhanced capital notes (ECNs; a form of contingent convertible security often known as a 'coco'). Lord Neuberger, President of the court, delivered the majority opinion and provided some observations on the interpretation of the trust deed (paras. [30] and [33]):
"Over the past 20 years or so, the House of Lords and Supreme Court have given considerable (some may think too much) general guidance as to the proper approach to interpreting contracts and indeed other commercial documents, such as the Trust Deed in this case. What, if any, weight is to be given to what was said in other documents, which were available at the time when the contract concerned was made or when the Trust Deed in question took effect, must be highly dependent on the facts of the particular case. However, when construing a contract or Trust Deed which governs the terms upon which a negotiable instrument is held, as in the present case, very considerable circumspection is appropriate before the contents of such other documents are taken into account. ... In the present case, the Trust Deed, and in particular those parts of clauses 7, 8 and 19 of the T&Cs which fall to be construed, cannot be understood unless one has some appreciation of the regulatory policy of the FSA at and before the time that the ECNs were issued".
"In the present case, the Trust Deed, and in particular those parts of clauses 7, 8 and 19 of the T&Cs which fall to be construed, cannot be understood unless one has some appreciation of the regulatory policy of the FSA at and before the time that the ECNs were issued. That is self-evident from the provisions of clause 19 which are set out in paras 13 and 14 above. Accordingly, I consider that at least the general thrust and effect of the FSA regulatory material published in 2008 and 2009 can be taken into account when interpreting the T&Cs".
A summary of the court's decision was delivered in person by Lord Neuberger this morning:
A message from Robert Goddard, Senior Lecturer in Law, Aston Law School, Aston Business School, Birmingham, UK. Email: robert_goddard@outlook.com or r.j.goddard@aston.ac.uk
At Aston I teach (or have taught) courses in fraud, company law, corporate governance, securities law, financial regulation and taxation. This site primarily supports my company (corporate) law and governance teaching and to a lesser extent the other subjects I teach. It is primarily an online notepad where I record important developments, news and other items that interest me.
Users of this site include my students as well as colleagues at Aston and other universities. Practitioners tell me they find the site useful too. In 2010 the site was commended in Legal Week and also chosen as one of the LexisNexis Top 25 Business Law Blogs 2010.
The site's primary focus is the UK but interesting items from other jurisdictions are often included as are developments in the allied disciplines of capital market regulation and financial reporting.
To find information on certain topics, enter keywords into the search box above (e.g., financial reporting, pay, Companies Act, Australia, shareholder, director). This facility is not case-sensitive. If you are searching for certain section numbers from Acts, it is best to enter only the section number.
If you have any feedback, suggestions for entries, or if you find a link that does not work, please e-mail me. Please also feel free to leave a comment on individual posts (only comments that are useful to other readers will be published; if your comment contains a link to another site, that site must be relevant to the post). You are also welcome to connect with me using:
No comments:
Post a Comment