Season's greetings to all blog visitors and those receiving the daily email updates. I hope that you have found the contents useful and interesting over the past year (any feedback is welcome; a major task for the new year will be updating the collections of links).
The first blog post and email update for 2016 will appear on January 4.
With best wishes for 2016, Robert.
Following a consultation earlier this year, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) has confirmed the Government's plans for the introduction of the new Register of People with Significant Control: see here (pdf). Secondary legislation - the People with Significant Control Regulations - will be laid before Parliament in January 2016, and companies will be required to keep a PSC register from 6 April 2016. Legislation will be introduced to bring LLPs into the PSC regime alongside companies. Finalised guidance will be published in January 2016. Further information is available here.
The legislation that will introduce the twin peaks financial regulatory framework in South Africa has been introduced in Parliament. A copy of the Bill - the Financial Sector Regulation Bill - is available here (pdf) and its progress can be followed here. Further background information is available here.
The Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission has published a corporate governance blueprint, containing best practice recommendations that will form the basis for a governance code to be published in 2016. A copy of the blueprint, in English, is available here (pdf).
The Financial Reporting Council has published its draft plan and budget for 2016/17: see here (pdf). As well as setting out priorities for the year ahead (including forthcoming publications), the FRC's plan also seeks views on proposed indicators of governance quality, including the proportion of FTSE350 companies stating that they have met all, or all but one, of the provisions in the UK Corporate Governance Code and the perceived quality of 'comply or explain' explanations.
A new corporate governance code - titled 'Best Practice of GPW Listed Companies 2016' - has been published by the Warsaw Stock Exchange (GPW) and comes into force on 1 January 2016. A copy of the code is available here (pdf) and further information is available here.
The Central Bank of Ireland has, in the past few months, published new corporate governance requirements (formerly known as codes) for: captive insurance and captive reinsurance undertakings; insurance undertakings; and credit institutions. The new requirements documents can be found here.
The Swedish Corporate Governance Board has published a new edition of the Swedish Corporate Governance Code, following a consultation earlier this year. A copy of the new Code, in English, is available here (pdf).
Following a review earlier this year, the Securities Market Association has published a new edition of the Finnish Corporate Governance Code, effective from 1 January 2016: see here (English, pdf).
Judgment was given last Friday in Cosmetic Warriors Ltd v Gerrie & Anor [2015] EWHC 3718 (Ch). A first instance decision concerning the interpretation of terms in a set of articles of association would not, ordinarily draw much attention. The judgment comes, however, after two important Supreme Court decisions concerning contract construction and implied terms - Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 and Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd (Rev 1) [2015] UKSC 72 - and, in particular, observations therein concerning the approach adopted by Lord Hoffmann in Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10.
The trial judge held, amongst other things, that there was no absolute prohibition on considering extrinsic material for the purpose of interpreting the articles of association of a company; however, that admissible background was, for the purposes of construction, limited to what any reader of the articles would reasonably be supposed to know. In contrast, the trial judge held, the implication of a term based on extrinsic evidence of which only a limited number of people would have known was impermissible.
HM Treasury is consulting on the tools the Financial Policy Committee should have in respect of its powers of direction and the UK buy to let market: see here. The consultation paper is accompanied by draft legislation - The Bank of England Act 1998 (Macro-prudential Measures) Order 2016, available here (pdf) - and an impact assessment (here, pdf).
It has been reported in the media that the Companies Bill 2015, which received its first reading in October in the Dewan Rakyat, is one of nine Bills for which second reading has been deferred to the next session in March 2016: see here.
Earlier this year the Companies Bill 2014 was introduced in the National Assembly and is nearing the conclusion of its legislative journey: see here. A copy of the Bill is available here.
The Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority have today published final rules in respect of the new accountability framework (the senior managers and certification regimes) for individuals working in the UK branches of overseas banks: see, respectively, here (pdf) and here (pdf).
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board has published new rules designed to provide investors with more information about who is participating in the audits of public companies. The new rules - available here - will require audit firms to disclose the names of each audit engagement partner and the names of other audit firms participating in each audit.
The Financial Reporting Council has announced that it will be assessing signatories' reporting under the UK Stewardship Code and making public its assessment: see here. Two tiers will be used. The first - Tier 1 - where reporting expectations are met and under which asset managers will be asked to provide evidence of the implementation of their approach to stewardship (the FRC says that it will look particularly at conflicts of interest disclosures, evidence of engagement and approach to resourcing and integration of stewardship). The second tier - Tier 2 - where the Tier 1 reporting expectations are not met.
The FRC says that it will contact firms before making public its assessment in order to allow time for improvements. The intention is that signatories wlll engage with this new process positively and will be proactive in improving their reporting of stewardship activities.
The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association has published an updated edition of its Corporate Governance Policy and Voting Guidelines: see here (pdf). An overview of some of the changes is available here. An addition to the guidelines concerns the holding of more than one directorship; a note has been added that it may be appropriate to vote against the (re-)election of a non-executive director holding more than four directorships in complex companies (a stricter approach is advocated where the director chairs a number of key committees).
HM Treasury and HMRC have published a draft of the Finance Bill 2016, together with explanatory notes and policy papers: see here. Draft Clause 65 (and its supporting Schedule) in the Bill contain the provisions introducing the requirement for certain large businesses to publish a tax strategy report: see here. According to the Schedule, the tax strategy report must explain:
(a) the approach of the UK group to risk management and governance arrangements in relation to UK taxation;
(b) the attitude of the group towards tax planning (so far as affecting UK taxation);
(c) the level of risk in relation to UK taxation that the group is prepared to accept; and
(d) the approach of the group towards its dealings with HMRC.
Grant Thornton has published the 2015 edition of its annual review of governance, based on the analysis of the annual reports of FTSE350 companies: see here (pdf). The report notes that 57% of companies complied fully with the UK Corporate Governance Code. The principal area of non-compliance is board independence. For the first time in four years, there was a reduction in the number of FTSE100 companies claiming full compliance (down to 64%). Reporting by companies of some matters - such as culture - remains highly variable.
Baroness Neville-Rolfe - the Minister in the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills responsible for corporate governance, company law and Companies House - delivered a speech earlier this month titled The Importance of Corporate Governance: see here. The speech explores recent changes but also highlights several forthcoming proposals that will be the subject of consultation, including the dematerialisation of paper share certificates and implementation of the EU Non-financial reporting Directive. Baroness Neville-Rolfe also identified areas for improvement, including the quality of financial and non-financial reporting.
The Financial Reporting Council has published a consultation paper setting out proposed revisions to the Audit Firm Governance Code, following an earlier consultation this year: see here (pdf). Amongst the proposals put forward by the FRC is a restatement of the Code's purpose. Appendix 1 of the consultation document contains the revised version of the Code being proposed by the FRC.
Earlier this year legislation was passed introducing Kenya's new company law framework: the Companies Act 2015 (see here, pdf). The introduction of this new legislative framework has been accompanied by the development of new governance and stewardship codes, draft versions of which were published earlier this year by the Capital Markets Authority: see here.
Judgment was given earlier today by the Supreme Court in Glengary Overseas Limited v JKX Oil & Gas Plc; Eclairs Group Limited v JKX Oil & Gas Plc [2015] UKSC 71. A copy of the judgment is available here or here (pdf). A summary is available here (pdf).
The judgment was expected earlier this year; indeed, an earlier hand-down date was published on the Supreme Court website. The reasons for the delay are now clear: the court's draft judgment was withdrawn before delivery, following representations from the parties, because it contained discussion of an issue - causation - that had not been the subject of argument during the oral hearing (submissions were, however, provided after the hearing at the invitation of the court).
Whilst the panel of judges agreed on the outcome of the appeal - that the proper purpose rule applied to the exercise of a power given to the directors under the articles - there was a reluctance amongst the majority to accept without further argument aspects of Lord Sumption's opinion (with which Lord Hodge agreed) which would result in a reframing of the rule. As Lord Mance observed (para. [53]:
"... although I have sympathy with Lord Sumption’s view that 'but for' causation offers a single, simple test, which it might be possible or even preferable to substitute for references to the principal or primary purpose, I am not persuaded that we can or should safely undertake what all parties consider would be 'a new development' of company law, without having heard argument".
Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge had agreed with the majority view in the High Court of Australia decision Whitehouse v Carlton House Pty (1987) 162 CLR 285, in which it was stated (at 294): "As a matter of logic and principle, the preferable view would seem to be that, regardless of whether the impermissible purpose was the dominant one or but one of a number of significantly contributing causes, the allotment will be invalidated if the impermissible purpose was causative in the sense that, but for its presence, 'the power would not have been exercised".
Elsewhere in his opinion, and less controversially, Lord Sumption explained the purpose of the proper purpose rule (now found in section 171 of the Companies Act 2006)(para. [37]):
The rule that the fiduciary powers of directors may be exercised only for the purposes for which they were conferred is one of the main means by which equity enforces the proper conduct of directors. It is also fundamental to the constitutional distinction between the respective domains of the board and the shareholders. These considerations are particularly important when the company is in play between competing groups seeking to control or influence its affairs".
A video recording of Lord Sumption explaining the court's decision is available below (this does not give an indication of the disagreement noted above):
NZX has begun a review of the corporate governance reporting requirements within the NZX Main Board Listing Rules with the publication of a discussion document: see here (pdf).
The Financial Policy Committee has published its second Financial Stability Report for 2015 (two reports are published in each calendar year): see here. An executive summary is available here (pdf). The FPC is maintaining the UK countercyclical capital buffer rate at 0% for the time being, but nevertheless states that it is "actively considering the appropriate setting" of the buffer; a review is planned for March 2016 and an increase seems likely. The FPC also notes that cyber risk continues to pose a threat to the financial system.
A message from Robert Goddard, Senior Lecturer in Law, Aston Law School, Aston Business School, Birmingham, UK. Email: robert_goddard@outlook.com or r.j.goddard@aston.ac.uk
At Aston I teach (or have taught) courses in fraud, company law, corporate governance, securities law, financial regulation and taxation. This site primarily supports my company (corporate) law and governance teaching and to a lesser extent the other subjects I teach. It is primarily an online notepad where I record important developments, news and other items that interest me.
Users of this site include my students as well as colleagues at Aston and other universities. Practitioners tell me they find the site useful too. In 2010 the site was commended in Legal Week and also chosen as one of the LexisNexis Top 25 Business Law Blogs 2010.
The site's primary focus is the UK but interesting items from other jurisdictions are often included as are developments in the allied disciplines of capital market regulation and financial reporting.
To find information on certain topics, enter keywords into the search box above (e.g., financial reporting, pay, Companies Act, Australia, shareholder, director). This facility is not case-sensitive. If you are searching for certain section numbers from Acts, it is best to enter only the section number.
If you have any feedback, suggestions for entries, or if you find a link that does not work, please e-mail me. Please also feel free to leave a comment on individual posts (only comments that are useful to other readers will be published; if your comment contains a link to another site, that site must be relevant to the post). You are also welcome to connect with me using: