
The
Court of Appeal gave judgment yesterday in
Financial Conduct Authority v Macris [2015] EWCA Civ 490. At issue was whether Mr Macris was identified in certain notices given by the Authority to JPMorgan Chase Bank. Individuals identified in such notices are given certain 'third party' rights under
section 393 of the
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Mr Macris was JP Morgan's International Chief Investment Officer and whilst the notices did not name him they were critical of JP Morgan's Chief Investment Office in London and New York.
The Upper Tribunal held that Mr Macris had been identified and was therefore entitled to the rights set out in
section 393: see
[2014] UKUT B7 (TCC). The Court of Appeal agreed that Mr Macris had been identified, in what is now the leading judgment on
section 393.
No comments:
Post a Comment