data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e1c1/6e1c1950fb4f08b9e2d176395a2b45d615101ab4" alt=""
The
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) gave judgment yesterday in
Burns v Financial Conduct Authority [2014] UKUT 0509 (TCC): see
here (
pdf). The Tribunal held that Mrs Burns was not fit and proper to hold a non-executive director position. She had, the Tribunal held, "turned a blind eye" to various ethical issues concerning conflicts of interest.
In its decision, the Tribunal commented on the role of the non-executive director (at para. [121]): "It is a sensitive function. Non-execs often have wide-ranging business interests. A non-exec position requires rigorous adherence to the proper standards concerning avoidance of conflicts and the making of disclosures".
No comments:
Post a Comment