The
Supreme Court gave its judgment today in
R v Rollins [2010] UKSC 39. The case concerned the
Financial Service Authority's powers of prosecution. It was argued that the FSA's power to prosecute criminal offences was limited to the offences referred to in Sections
401 and
402 of the
Financial Services and Markets Act (2000) and that the FSA could not, therefore, prosecute other offences including those of money laundering contrary to Sections
327 and
328 of the
Proceeds of Crime Act (2002). A unanimous Supreme Court rejected this argument. A summary of the court's judgment is available
here (
pdf).
No comments:
Post a Comment