The Court of Appeal gave judgment yesterday in
Winterflood Securities Ltd & Ors v The Financial Services Authority [2010] EWCA Civ 423, an important decision concerning market abuse under
Section 118 of the
Financial Services and Markets Act (2000).
The court held that an actuating purpose - defined in the
FSA Handbook glossary as "a purpose which motivates or incites a person to act" - was not required in respect of two examples of market abuse (price positioning and artificial transactions) in the Code of Market Conduct.
The
FSA has welcomed the decision: see its announcement
here. Background facts for the case are available
here (
pdf).
No comments:
Post a Comment