Friday, 22 August 2008

USA: California: directors' duties and corporate social responsibility

Section 309 of the California Corporations Code provides that a director must act in good faith, in the manner in which he/she believes to be in the best interests of the corporation and its shareholders. A proposal to amend Section 309 is currently before the California State Legislature. Assembly Bill 2944 , introduced by Assemblyman Mark Leno, will provide that in acting in the best interests of the corporation, the director may consider:

(1) The long-term and the short-term interests of the corporation and its shareholders.
(2) The effects that the corporation’s actions may have in the short term or in the long term upon any of the following: 
  • The prospects for potential growth, development, productivity, and profitability of the corporation.
  • The economy of the state and the nation.
  • The corporation’s employees, suppliers, customers, and creditors.
  • Community and societal considerations.
  • The environment. 
The draft Bill makes clear that the introduction of the above provision will not impose on the director any legal or equitable duties, obligations of liabilities, or create any right or cause of action against the director. According to Assemblyman Leno, the Bill "would promote socially responsible corporate conduct by authorizing boards of directors to consider the interest of the full community, the environment and employees, along with the interest of shareholders, when making official decisions on behalf of the corporation".  There has, quite predictably, been opposition. For example, the Corporations Committee of the Business Law Section of the State Bar of California has argued that the Bill would undermine director accountability to shareholders without effectively promoting interests of non-shareholder stakeholders.

Notes:

[1] Progress of the Bill can be monitored here and for an overview of the legislative process in California, click here

[2] Bill 2944 does not go as far as the UK Companies Act (2006) which, in Section 172, requires the director to act:
in the way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in doing so have regard (amongst other matters) to: (a) the likely consequences of any decision in the long term, (b) the interests of the company's employees, (c) the need to foster the company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others, (d) the impact of the company's operations on the community and the environment, (e) the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct, and (f) the need to act fairly as between members of the company".

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

This bill was passed but subsequently vetoed on 30 September 2008.

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_2901-2950/ab_2944_vt_20080930.html