In Gemma Ltd (in liquidation) v Davies and another [2008] EWHC 546 (Ch), [2008] WLR (D) 89, the High Court explored the circumstances in which an individual would be regarded as a de facto director for the purposes of Section 212 of the Insolvency Act (1986). The judgment, which has not yet been published on BAILII, contains a useful overview of the authorities. The trial judge outlined several principles:
(1) It must be proved that the alleged de facto director performed functions that could only be discharged by a director.
(2) There is no need to prove that a de facto director was held out as a director.
(3) The director must have participated on an equal footing with the other directors and not in a subordinate role.
NB: The Companies Act (2006) does not contain a specific definition for de facto director. Section 250 does, however, define the term "director" (in such a way as to include de facto directors) and Section 251 defines the term "shadow director".
No comments:
Post a Comment